Price and performance details for the ZX C-960 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Videocard Category: Desktop
Other names: ZX C-960
Videocard First Benchmarked: 2024-10-09
G3DMark/Price: NA
Overall Rank: NA
Last Price Change: NA
DirectX 9 | 4 Frames/Sec |
---|---|
DirectX 10 | 8 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 11 | 1 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 12 | 0 Frames/Sec |
GPU Compute | 13 Ops/Sec |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3080 | 25,232 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 22,359 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 20,489 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 16,984 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 14,152 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 13,498 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 10,076 | |
GeForce GTX 1650 | 7,871 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 6,315 | |
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 60.66 | |
GeForce GTX 1650 | 52.48 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 45.63 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 37.25 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 37.14 | |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 37.11 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 29.64 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 25.47 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 14.74 | |
ZX C-960 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
BL2214844 - Oct 09 2024 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
GeForce RTX 4090 vs ZX C-960 | 38,572 (+46381.9%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 vs ZX C-960 | 34,630 (+41631.7%) | |
RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs ZX C-960 | 34,569 (+41557.7%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 34,278 (+41207.0%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 31,828 (+38254.6%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 31,732 (+38138.8%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ZX C-960 | 31,055 (+37323.4%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 30,193 (+36284.4%) | |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 29,672 (+35657.4%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,864 (+34683.5%) | |
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,157 (+33831.3%) | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |